高尔夫读者

由于国家级高尔夫裁判12号就要开始培训考试，阿Joe的一位老友Johnson从明天开始就休假准备考试的事情，让我羡慕不已。

Johnson和阿Joe一样做高尔夫赛事，也天天忙，不过他的意志力比我的强多了，几乎每天都花时间看规则和判例书，呵！

(more…)

哈，又看到中级裁判员考试的成绩啦，阿Joe认识的很多人都网上有名哦！

Lydia考了个超级好的成绩，恭喜。另外还有Johnson、Helen他们也考得不错。

祝贺一个。详细成绩请查看全文。 (more…)

原来今天在珠海金湾考中级高尔夫裁判，差一点都忘了！似乎从今年开始高尔夫裁判只可以一年考一个级别，所以之前像檀馨那样一年就考完了从初级到国际级的现象是不可能再发生的了。 (more…)

这两个高尔夫规则案例是从高尔夫裁判圈的论坛上看到的，是一位叫“不懂规则”的网友在论坛上向李老师提的问题。转过来大家分享，是因为其中涉及到的情况在现实的赛事中是经常会遇到的。 (more…)

继上次五月份中高协在新浪上放了大家一次飞机之后（在辽宁的中级高尔夫裁判培训据说因为人数不足而取消），今天在新浪上终于看到了在珠海金湾高尔夫球会举行的09年第一期的中级高尔夫裁判培训通知。 (more…)

6-2b/0.5 Meaning of “Handicap” When Full Handicap Not Used

Q. It is the condition of a stroke-play competition (e.g., four-ball) that players will not receive their full handicap allowances. Under Rule 6-2b, what is the player responsible for recording on his score card?

A. He must record his full handicap. It is the Committee’s responsibility to apply the condition of competition to adjust his handicap. (New) (more…)

今天晚上在宿舍时和舍友碰到了一个判例，我们两个在宿舍辩论了半天，后来终于明白为什么那个案例中要以违反15-3来处置。

判例问题和答案如下：27-2c/3

Q: A player’s ball came to rest 20 yards over a green and beyond a white stake which the player’s caddie said was a boundary stake. The player played a provisional ball which came to rest short of the green, but closer to the hole than his original ball. The player played the provisional ball onto the green. At that point, he walked behind the green towards his original ball, which had been visible all along, and discovered that the white stake was not a boundary stake and that his original ball was in bounds. What is the ruling?

A: The player should have determined the status of his original ball before playing a second stroke with the provisional ball and, since the original ball was not out of bounds, he should have abandoned the provisional ball. When he failed to do so, the second stroke with the provisional ball was a stroke with a wrong ball – Rule 27-2c.
In match play, the player lost the hole (Rule 15-3a).
In stroke play, he incurred a two-stroke penalty (Rule 15-3b) and was required to hole out with the original ball.

我们之间的争论在于，为什么该球手的情况不能按27-2b进行处理，即暂定球在该情况下成为使用中球；而判例却判定球手打了错误的球。

我们把相关的问题集中了一下，还找了27-2b/1和27-2b/2两个判例进行了对比，发现我们的思路并没有错，而且27-2b/1和27-2b/2两个判例也证明暂定球在球手放弃寻找初始球而打了暂定球的时候（当然，还要符合其它要求）该暂定球会成为使用中球。

那么，为什么会是打了错误的球呢？

后来我们再看了一遍原文，发现，我们又再一次成为粗心的马大哈。原文中说打了球进了（误以为是界外）的桩外面，并且一直都可以看得到球（his original ball, which had beed visible all along）！所以，在这样的情况之下球手有责任去确认他的球的状态是不是已经OB了，没有OB的话而他的球却一直都看得到，不算lost ball，所以无法按27-2b进行处置，打了球也就违反了15-3a或15-3b。

看来，还是不够细心。