Home >  > 关于规则15-2、规则20-6、规则20-7以及规则27-1适用范围的疑问

关于规则15-2、规则20-6、规则20-7以及规则27-1适用范围的疑问

4

26-1/3.7 Ball Dropped Under Water Hazard Rule Without It Being Known or Virtually Certain Ball in Hazard; Original Ball Then Found

Q. A player’s ball is struck towards a water hazard and is not found. It is neither known nor virtually certain that the player’s ball is in the water hazard, but he drops a ball under Rule 26-1b. Before he plays the dropped ball, his original ball is found within the five-minute search period. What is the ruling?

A. It was neither known nor virtually certain that the player’s ball was in the water hazard when he put the substituted ball into play, and, therefore, that ball was incorrectly substituted under an inapplicable Rule.

The player must correct his error under Rule 20-6 by abandoning the substituted ball and continuing play with the original ball. If the original ball was found inside the water hazard, the player may proceed under Rule 26-1.

If the player failed to correct his improper procedure and played the dropped ball, he has proceeded under an inapplicable Rule and incurred a penalty (see Decision 34-3/6). The ruling would be that the player has proceeded under Rule 27-1 (the only Rule that applied to his situation), incurring the one-stroke penalty under that Rule. Additionally, as he played the ball from a wrong place (i.e. a place not permitted by Rule 27-1), he incurred the general penalty, loss of hole in match play or two strokes in stroke play, for a breach of Rule 27-1. In stroke play, the Committee must determine whether the player committed a serious breach when he played from the wrong place (Rule 20-7c). (New)

很明显,球手在击球之前可以按规则20-6处置,使用他的初始球以改正他的错误,这样不会受到处罚。

现在我的疑问是:

若按照规则15-2,那么球手已经错误地替换了球,球成为使用中球;若接下来打了球,由于在错误的地方击球,违反规则20-7。

很明显,上面的判例认为需要根据27-1的一杆加距离的规则去处置,无论是规则15-2或者是规则20-7都是不适用的规则。

为什么?



相关文章

无觅评论,优化体验,加强品牌价值