<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 留言本</title>
	<atom:link href="http://golfreader.com/guestbook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://golfreader.com</link>
	<description>Eyes on golf</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>是有点拗口！ 我也隐约觉得是这样的意思，经你解释完全明白了！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>是有点拗口！ 我也隐约觉得是这样的意思，经你解释完全明白了！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>问题中你的理解是对的。
A实际已经打了4杆，下一杆能进。但他告诉B打了5杆，6杆能进。
这时B打了5杆，B认可了A的下一次击球。
但在B击球之前，A更正了他的错误，但这时已晚（答案中有解释，after receiving incorrect information, B concedes his opponent (A) ’s next stroke 

答案中最后一句话的意思是，最后的判罚不会由于“A的球离洞有多近（即下一杆就能推进，5杆完成）”、或“B下一杆打得再好也击败不了A这样的事实（下一杆打得再好也只6杆，负于A）”而改变。

即不可能由于100%的可能性B要负于A而改变判罚（即不判A该洞负），因为A违反了9-2

有点拗口，哈哈</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>问题中你的理解是对的。<br />
A实际已经打了4杆，下一杆能进。但他告诉B打了5杆，6杆能进。<br />
这时B打了5杆，B认可了A的下一次击球。<br />
但在B击球之前，A更正了他的错误，但这时已晚（答案中有解释，after receiving incorrect information, B concedes his opponent (A) ’s next stroke </p>
<p>答案中最后一句话的意思是，最后的判罚不会由于“A的球离洞有多近（即下一杆就能推进，5杆完成）”、或“B下一杆打得再好也击败不了A这样的事实（下一杆打得再好也只6杆，负于A）”而改变。</p>
<p>即不可能由于100%的可能性B要负于A而改变判罚（即不判A该洞负），因为A违反了9-2</p>
<p>有点拗口，哈哈</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>你看8/2和8-1/21就有这两种情况的说明：
[b]8-1/21 Advice Given by Team Mate in Another Group in Stroke Play[/b]
Q. Individual and team competitions are being played concurrently in stroke play. A competitor is given advice by a team mate who is playing in another group. What is the ruling?
A. The team mate would be penalized two strokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你看8/2和8-1/21就有这两种情况的说明：<br />
[b]8-1/21 Advice Given by Team Mate in Another Group in Stroke Play[/b]<br />
Q. Individual and team competitions are being played concurrently in stroke play. A competitor is given advice by a team mate who is playing in another group. What is the ruling?<br />
A. The team mate would be penalized two strokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,

今天在判例书里看到一个不明之处，希望你能指点一下

9-2/7
Q. In a match, A&#039;s ball was a few inches from the hole.  B asked A, &quot;How many will that be in the hole?&quot;(这句是不是问“下一杆如果打进洞以后一共是几杆？”） A answered &quot;6&quot;, whereupon B, lying 5, conceded A&#039;s next stroke.  Before B putted, A informs B that he (A) had actually scored 5.  What is the ruling?

A. A loses the hole under Rule 9-2 for giving wrong information.
The principle of Rule 9-2 applies if, after receiving incorrect information, a player picks up his ball,concedes his opponent&#039;s next stroke or takes some similar action before the mistake is corrected.
In this case, the answer does not turn on how close A&#039;s ball was to the hole or on the fact that B could not have done any better.(最后这个长句是什么意思？）</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>今天在判例书里看到一个不明之处，希望你能指点一下</p>
<p>9-2/7<br />
Q. In a match, A&#8217;s ball was a few inches from the hole.  B asked A, &#8220;How many will that be in the hole?&#8221;(这句是不是问“下一杆如果打进洞以后一共是几杆？”） A answered &#8220;6&#8243;, whereupon B, lying 5, conceded A&#8217;s next stroke.  Before B putted, A informs B that he (A) had actually scored 5.  What is the ruling?</p>
<p>A. A loses the hole under Rule 9-2 for giving wrong information.<br />
The principle of Rule 9-2 applies if, after receiving incorrect information, a player picks up his ball,concedes his opponent&#8217;s next stroke or takes some similar action before the mistake is corrected.<br />
In this case, the answer does not turn on how close A&#8217;s ball was to the hole or on the fact that B could not have done any better.(最后这个长句是什么意思？）</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>是另有规则如此规定吗，我看了看规则8和规则33，没有看到对给建议的人是否正在参加比赛的区分。

Rule 8的Note如下：

The Committee may, in the conditions of a team competition (Rule 33-1), permit each team to appoint one person who may give advice (including pointing out a line for putting) to members of that team.  The  Committee may establish conditions relating to the appointment and permitted conduct of the person, who must be identified to the Committee byfore giving advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>是另有规则如此规定吗，我看了看规则8和规则33，没有看到对给建议的人是否正在参加比赛的区分。</p>
<p>Rule 8的Note如下：</p>
<p>The Committee may, in the conditions of a team competition (Rule 33-1), permit each team to appoint one person who may give advice (including pointing out a line for putting) to members of that team.  The  Committee may establish conditions relating to the appointment and permitted conduct of the person, who must be identified to the Committee byfore giving advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin，对的，在团队比赛里可以有比赛条件允许设一位队长，不打球时，为所有队员提供建议。
但是，如果那位队长正在参加比赛，那他就只能为同组的队员提供建议了。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin，对的，在团队比赛里可以有比赛条件允许设一位队长，不打球时，为所有队员提供建议。<br />
但是，如果那位队长正在参加比赛，那他就只能为同组的队员提供建议了。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://golfreader.com/guestbook/comment-page-3#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golfreader.com/?page_id=119#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>
8/2
Team Captain Gives Advice While Playing
Q: If the Committee has adopted the note to Rule 8 as a condition of the competition, may a Team Captain, while playing in the competition, give advice to a team mate other than his partner?
A: No.

不明白，Note是允许一个team里的一个人为其他team member提供建议的，为什么这里的答案是No呢？  

Joe怎么看这个问题？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8/2<br />
Team Captain Gives Advice While Playing<br />
Q: If the Committee has adopted the note to Rule 8 as a condition of the competition, may a Team Captain, while playing in the competition, give advice to a team mate other than his partner?<br />
A: No.</p>
<p>不明白，Note是允许一个team里的一个人为其他team member提供建议的，为什么这里的答案是No呢？  </p>
<p>Joe怎么看这个问题？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

